Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Rammstein Album
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 11:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- New Rammstein Album (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Completely unsourced speculation (even the title is extremely vague) about a possibly upcoming album. Unfortunately, WP:CRYSTAL isn't a criterion for speedy deletion, or I would have taken care of it myself. I think classifying it as spam is a bit of a stretch, so I'm posting it here instead. Kafziel Talk 19:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I'm pretty sure that their next album won't be entitled "New Rammstein Album," either. RJC Talk 19:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 20:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wow. More singing, more growling. I wouldn't expect anything less from Rammstein, but unfortunately that's all we have, is vague talk about some of the possible content. Let's wait until Rammstein actually comes up with a name and at least a semi-concrete release date, 'k? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 01:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per precedent Will (talk) 02:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. No prejudice against recration but only if they change the name to "New Rammstein Album." --Cheeser1 (talk) 05:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I look forward to an article on Rammstein's "screaming/growling" once there is substantial information available - as the template notes, once it is "scheduled or expected". This doesn't appear to be the case yet, though. Zetawoof(ζ) 05:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, should have been speedied as the title gives it away. -RiverHockey (talk) 23:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- but there's still no relevant speedy criterion, unfortunately. tomasz. 11:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. fails the Forthcoming Album Article Test Triumvirate: no title, no tracks, no sources. tomasz. 11:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.